Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Tuesday, 04 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-05-28 dismissed

Gopal Prasad vs Bihar School Examination Board & Others

Bench: 2 — Ajay Rastogi, Indira Banerjee

In Brief

Gopal Prasad was appointed at age 15½ to Bihar School Examination Board and sought retirement benefits as per his actual date of birth (19 Nov 1954). The Board retired him upon completing 42 years of service in May 2012, treating his entry age as 18 years per a 2004 resolution. The Supreme Court split 1-1 on whether Rule 73 (prescribing age 60 as retirement date) implicitly limits service to 42 years maximum. The majority (Rastogi J.) upheld retirement after 42 years, treating the service cap as implicit in pension rules. The minority (Banerjee J.) found age, not service length, governs retirement and the Board's order was ultra vires. No majority opinion; appeal dismissed, with assignment to larger Bench on disagreement.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Employment Law Retirement & Superannuation Constitutional Law Public Service Pension Law Service Rules

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login