Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Saturday, 07 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-12-15 dismissed

H.D. Sikand (D) through L.Rs vs Central Bureau of Investigation and Anr

Bench: 2 — Pinaki Chandra Ghose

In Brief

A man was killed by a parcel bomb at his residence in Delhi on 2 October 1982. The accused, Lt. Col. S.J. Chaudhary, was convicted by the trial court for murder and offences under the Explosive Substances Act based on circumstantial evidence, including alleged motive (ex-wife living with the deceased), supposed access to explosives, and delayed eyewitness testimony. The Delhi High Court acquitted him, finding the chain of circumstances incomplete. The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal, holding that the prosecution failed to meet the rigorous tests for conviction on circumstantial evidence, particularly regarding eyewitness reliability, the weakness of motive alone, and deficiencies in expert evidence on typewriter comparison.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Circumstantial Evidence Murder Explosive Substances Witness Credibility Expert Evidence

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login