Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-02-18 allowed

HIRA LAL vs THE STATE OF BIHAR

Bench: 3 — Uday Umesh Lalit, Indu Malhotra, Hemant Gupta

In Brief

A retired government veterinary officer challenged the withholding of 10% of his pension and all gratuity by the State of Bihar while criminal proceedings remained pending. The Court held that pension and gratuity are property rights protected under Article 300A of the Constitution. Administrative circulars lacked legal force to override statutory pension rules. Before July 2012, no statutory rule permitted withholding benefits during pending proceedings; only after conviction. The Court directed payment of 10% withheld between 2008–2012, with 90% gratuity immediately released. After July 2012, when Rule 43(c) was statutorily enacted, withholding 10% pending proceedings became lawful.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Administrative Law Government Service & Pension Property Rights Article 300A Due Process and Natural Justice

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login