In Brief
A retired Assistant Store Superintendent sought release of withheld pension and gratuity. The State withheld 30% of gratuity and pension for six years, claiming alleged stock discrepancies in his department. The High Court quashed the withholding orders and awarded 10% interest. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to release the dues, holding that pension and gratuity are vested rights requiring mandatory procedural safeguards (departmental enquiry, Public Service Commission consultation). However, the Court reduced interest to 6% per annum on pension and 8% per annum on gratuity, aligning with statutory requirements and precedent.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.