Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Saturday, 07 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-11-10 partly_allowed

India Containers Ltd vs Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs and Ors

Bench: 2 — Ranjan Gogoi

In Brief

India Containers Ltd challenged a High Court order that exercised jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution to impose excise penalties. The Supreme Court, finding that an alternative statutory remedy existed under Section 35H of the Central Excise Act, 1944, issued notice on the petition and stayed penalty recovery. The Court noted that the High Court may have relied upon non-existent statutory provisions to impose the penalty, raising questions about both its jurisdiction and the substantive validity of the penalty order itself.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Excise Law Constitutional Law Administrative Procedure Jurisdiction

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login