Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Sunday, 08 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-06-29 dismissed

Jamnadas & Anr vs State of M.P

Bench: 2 — Prafulla C. Pant

In Brief

A young bride, Bhoomi @ Richa, was brutally murdered inside her marital home six months after marriage. Her body was cut into two pieces and disposed of in a public garden. The father-in-law and husband appealed their convictions for murder under IPC Section 302 read with Section 34. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, holding that in cases of secret murder within a house, inmates bear a burden under Section 106 of the Evidence Act to explain the death. The complete chain of circumstantial evidence—the murder occurring in the house, blood stains found there, the body's disposal by the mother-in-law (witnessed by multiple persons), multiple ante-mortem injuries indicating plural assailants, and the appellants' false alibi—established guilt beyond doubt. The Court rejected the alibi defence that they were at their shop, dismissing the appeals.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Murder Circumstantial Evidence Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC Common Intention Section 106 Evidence Act Alibi Defence Burden of Proof Domestic Violence

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login