Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-12-04 dismissed

Surendra Singh & Anr vs State of Uttarakhand

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

Three men were convicted of the murder of a shopkeeper, Rajendra Prasad, who was found dead in his shop in January 1990 with severe head injuries. The case relied entirely on circumstantial evidence: the accused had motive (prior threats), were seen near the crime scene in a specific vehicle, and stolen goods from the shop and a blood-stained weapon were recovered at their instances. The High Court upheld the conviction. The Supreme Court, declining to reassess evidence already evaluated by two lower courts, confirmed that all seven key circumstances—motive, presence, recovered articles, identification, weapon discovery, bloodstained clothing, and keys—collectively proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The appeal was dismissed."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Evidence Law Circumstantial Evidence Murder Common Intention Appellate Jurisdiction

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login