Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-12-04 dismissed

Surendra Singh & Anr vs State of Uttarakhand

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

Three men were prosecuted for murdering Rajendra Prasad in his village shop in 1990. Based on circumstantial evidence—including motive (a grudge the lead accused held against the victim), the accused being seen in the area shortly before the crime, recovery of stolen goods and a blood-stained weapon from their homes, and discovery of the victim's shop lock—both trial and high courts found them guilty and sentenced them to life imprisonment. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, holding that the seven circumstances established by the prosecution formed an unbroken chain proving guilt beyond doubt, and that the courts below committed no perversity in their findings."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Murder Circumstantial Evidence Common Intention Appellate Jurisdiction Burden of Proof

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login