Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-09-25 allowed

Jignesh Shah & Anr vs Union of India & Anr

Bench: 3 — R.F. Nariman

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that winding up petitions filed under the Companies Act are subject to the three-year limitation period under Article 137 of the Limitation Act. When IL&FS filed a winding up petition against La-Fin in October 2016—more than three years after the company defaulted on a share purchase undertaking in August 2012—the petition was time-barred. The Court clarified that filing a separate suit for specific performance does not extend the limitation period for winding up proceedings, as they are distinct remedies. Additionally, winding up petitions cannot be used to enforce disputed debts. The Court set aside the NCLT and NCLAT orders admitting the petition.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insolvency Limitation Winding Up Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login