Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-04-09 partly_allowed

Kameshwar Singh : Tarkeshwar Singh and others vs State of Bihar & Ors

Bench: 2 — Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

In Brief

A brutal murder case where the deceased's body was dismembered and disposed in two separate locations to destroy evidence. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of Kameshwar Singh, whose guilt was proved by consistent eyewitness testimony showing he throttled the victim, coupled with clear motive (the deceased was a witness against him in pending railway theft cases). However, the Court acquitted four co-appellants (Tarkeshwar Singh, Bahadur Ram Kahar, Bikarama Dusadh, Nagina Koiri), finding only vague evidence of their participation. The Court held that suspicion cannot replace proof and extended benefit of doubt where specific, reliable material was absent.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Evidence Murder Destruction of Evidence Eyewitness Testimony Common Intention Benefit of Doubt

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login