Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 22 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-01-18 partly_allowed

Killer Thiayagu @ Thiyagu vs State

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

A-1 was convicted of murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 (common intention) along with three co-accused. The High Court acquitted the three co-accused due to credibility issues in the sole eyewitness account but upheld A-1's conviction. The Supreme Court held that vicarious liability under Section 34 cannot apply where the alleged co-conspirators are acquitted and no other persons are shown to have acted jointly. Since A-1 personally caused only a knife wound to the victim's leg, he was liable only for grievous hurt under Section 324. The Court set aside the murder conviction and converted it to Section 324, remitting him to liberty given seven years in custody."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Common Intention Murder Vicarious Liability Acquittal

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login