Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 22 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-01-18 partly_allowed

Killer Thiayagu @ Thiyagu vs State

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Killer Thiayagu was convicted of murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 (common intention) for a knife attack in which he allegedly exhorted co-accused to assault the victim. The High Court acquitted three co-accused but upheld his conviction. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal in part, holding that once co-accused are acquitted and there is no evidence of other persons acting in concert, vicarious liability under Section 34 cannot attach. The appellant could only be held liable for the specific knife injury he inflicted on the victim's leg, downgrading his conviction to Section 324 (causing hurt). He was set at liberty immediately after serving seven years in custody.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Indian Penal Code Murder Common Intention Vicarious Liability Section 34 Criminal Appeal Acquittal of Co-Accused

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login