Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-04-04 allowed

Kriti Lakhina and Others vs State of Karnataka and Others

Bench: 2 — Uday Umesh Lalit

In Brief

Forty-four doctors who completed their MBBS/BDS from Karnataka colleges and qualified in NEET-PG challenged the eligibility clause in the State's Information Bulletin for postgraduate medical admissions. The clause imposed a "Karnataka origin" domicile condition, effectively excluding MBBS graduates from competing for government and government-quota seats unless they met strict origin criteria. The Supreme Court held the condition invalid under Article 14 (equality). Following its earlier decision in Vishal Goyal v. Karnataka (2014), the Court ruled that while institutional preference (up to 50% of seats for same-institution candidates) is permissible, disguised domicile restrictions that arbitrarily exclude meritorious candidates violate equality. The State was directed to amend the Information Bulletin to permit all MBBS/BDS graduates from Karnataka colleges to compete on merit.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Medical Education Equality and Non-Discrimination Domicile Restrictions Admission Criteria

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login