Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-08-17 dismissed

Rajdeep Ghosh vs State of Assam & Ors

Bench: 2 — Arun Mishra

In Brief

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Rule 3(1)(c) of Assam's Medical Colleges admission rules, which require candidates to study from Class VII to XII within the State to be eligible for State-quota seats. The petitioners, who had studied Class XI and XII outside Assam, challenged this as violative of Article 14. The Court held that the requirement is a valid classification with rational nexus to ensuring medical professionals serve the State, particularly in remote areas. Such domicile and institutional requirements are permissible for basic MBBS/BDS courses. The Court distinguished between government and private employees' wards, and noted exemptions exist for government officials posted outside. The classification was held neither irrational nor arbitrary, and candidates were presumed aware of eligibility criteria when choosing outside education.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Medical Education Constitutional Law Administrative Law Reservation and Eligibility Article 14 - Equality Educational Institutions

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login