Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-08-21 disposed

Kudrat Sandhu vs Union of India & Anr

Bench: 3 — Dipak Misra, A. M. Sapre, Sanjay Karol

In Brief

This judgment addresses confusion regarding the age of superannuation for members and chairpersons of various tribunals under Indian law. The Supreme Court clarified that ITAT members serve until age 62 (Presidents until 65); CESTAT members until 62 (Presidents until 65); AFT members until 65 (Chairpersons who are former Supreme Court Judges until 70); and CAT operates under old rules. The Court emphasized that judicial officers selected as tribunal members should not have less favourable tenure terms than in their original service. The Union government was directed to file a status report on tribunal vacancies and selection progress within two weeks.",

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Tribunals Service Law Superannuation Government of India

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login