Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-08-14 partly_allowed

Kum C. Yamini vs State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr

Bench: 3 — R. Subhash Reddy

In Brief

Ad hoc judges appointed to preside over Fast Track Courts cannot claim seniority in the permanent judicial cadre from the date of their initial ad hoc appointment. The Supreme Court held that ad hoc appointments made under special rules are fundamentally different from regular cadre appointments and confer no preferential rights. When subsequently regularised to the permanent cadre following fresh selection, seniority is fixed according to statutory rules governing that regular appointment. However, the Court directed that service rendered as Fast Track Court judges must be counted for pensionary and retiral benefits.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Judicial Service Seniority Administrative Law Constitutional Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login