Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-05-11 allowed

Kumar vs State represented by Inspector of Police

Bench: 2 — N.V. Ramana

In Brief

A man was convicted of murdering another in a street altercation during a village festival. The trial and high court upheld convictions under IPC Sections 302 (murder) and 324 (voluntary hurt) based primarily on eyewitness testimony. However, the Supreme Court found critical gaps: the accused was also injured but the prosecution never examined his medical records or treating doctor; the alleged motive (a prior quarrel) was weakly established; and evidence showed both men fought with wooden logs, with the deceased hitting the accused first. The Court emphasized that suppression of the accused's injuries by police investigators fatally undermines prosecution credibility. Setting aside the convictions, the Court acquitted the appellant, ruling the prosecution had failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Evidence Murder Injury Investigation Witness Examination Criminal Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login