Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-10-09 partly_allowed

LIMITED vs M/S. GAYATRI SHAKTI PAPER AND

Bench: 2 — Sanjiv Khanna, M.M. Sundresh

In Brief

This judgment interprets the Electricity Act, 2003 and the Electricity Rules, 2005 to define when a power plant qualifies as a Captive Generating Plant (CGP) and who can be a captive user. The Supreme Court held that Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) set up by companies to own and operate CGPs are "associations of persons" under the Rules. All captive users, whether individual or in groups, must maintain minimum 26% ownership and consume at least 51% of generated electricity annually. For group captive users, consumption must be proportionate to shareholding (with 10% tolerance). The minimum thresholds must be maintained throughout the financial year, not just at year-end. The judgment emphasizes legislative intent to promote energy independence for industries while preventing abuse through disproportionate ownership-consumption ratios.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Energy Law Electricity Regulation Captive Power Generation Administrative Law Infrastructure Commercial Law Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login