Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-11-13 dismissed

Monnet Ispat & Energy Ltd. Etc vs Union of India & Ors. Etc

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Monnet Ispat & Energy Ltd., a company operating a 90 MW captive power plant, challenged Rule 3(1)(a)(ii) of the Electricity Rules, 2005, which requires captive generating plants to use at least 51% of their annual electricity output for their own consumption. The company argued the rule was arbitrary and that temporary closures due to unforeseen circumstances should not disqualify the plant's status. The Supreme Court upheld the rule as constitutionally valid, holding that it reasonably implements the statutory requirement that captive plants be set up 'primarily for own use'. The annual calculation basis accommodates temporary closures, and the rule does not constitute impermissible delegation of legislative power. The appeals were dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Electricity Law Regulatory Law Administrative Law Constitutional Law — Ultra Vires Captive Power Generation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login