Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-11-13 dismissed

Monnet Ispat & Energy Ltd. Etc vs Union of India & Ors. Etc

Bench: 2 — Sanjay Kumar, Alok Aradhe

In Brief

Monnet Ispat & Energy Ltd. challenged Rule 3(1)(a)(ii) of the Electricity Rules, 2005, which mandates that captive power plants must consume at least 51% of generated electricity annually for their own use. The company argued the rule was arbitrary and ultra vires and should be struck down or read down when unforeseen circumstances prevented compliance. The Supreme Court upheld the rule as valid, holding that it operationalizes the statutory definition of \"captive generating plant\" (which requires generation primarily for \"his own use\") by providing a quantifiable, reasonable benchmark. The annual calculation reasonably accommodates temporary closures, including force majeure. No excessive delegation occurred; the rule elaborates statutory criteria and promotes the Act's purpose. The appeals were dismissed."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Electricity Law Administrative Law Constitutional Law Regulatory Power Ultra Vires Delegated Legislation Captive Generation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login