In Brief
The appellant was accused in a CBI investigation into alleged tampering and removal of court documents in a family court case. The CBI's final report, filed after a High Court-monitored investigation, concluded there was no material or circumstantial evidence against the appellant. The High Court refused discharge, citing that the CBI report could be used at trial. The Supreme Court held that the CBI's conclusive finding that there is no evidence against the accused warrants discharge. The Court set aside the High Court's order and allowed the appeal, directing the High Court to reconsider the discharge application in light of the CBI's exonerating report."
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.