Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 22 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-04-03 partly_allowed

M.K. Balakrishnan & Ors vs Union of India & Ors

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The Supreme Court reviewed the Union of India's expenditure of Rs. 945.95 crores on wetland management and Ramsar Convention sites. The Court found that despite substantial spending, visible ground-level improvements were lacking and accounting transparency was questionable. Rather than continuing central supervision, the Court directed that the expenditure affidavit be sent to 16 designated High Courts to monitor Ramsar sites as matters of international heritage through suo motu proceedings. High Courts were requested to appoint amici curiae if needed. The Union was directed to file a comprehensive audited affidavit within six weeks, with the matter relisted for July 2017.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Environmental Law Wetlands Public Interest Litigation Constitutional Law Ramsar Convention Judicial Review Administrative Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login