Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-01-14

State of U.P. & Ors vs All U.P. Consumer Protection Bar Association

Bench: 3 — Arijit Pasayat, Rekha Sharma

In Brief

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal against a High Court order directing establishment of five Consumer Fora in Uttar Pradesh. Instead of addressing the issue state-by-state, the Court constituted a three-member Committee comprising two former judges and the Union Secretary for Consumer Affairs to comprehensively examine infrastructure, staffing, service conditions and other systemic deficiencies affecting consumer dispute redressal commissions and forums across India. The Committee will visit States, interact with officials, prepare remedial roadmaps and submit recommendations for court approval. The matter was adjourned to April 2016 for review of interim reports and further directions."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Consumer Protection Administrative Law Constitutional Law Public Interest Litigation Infrastructure Service Conditions

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login