Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Thursday, 29 October 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-08-11 disposed

M. Siddiq (D) Through Legal Representatives vs Mahant Suresh Das and Ors

Bench: 3 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

This is a procedural order in a complex civil appeal concerning the Ayodhya temple-mosque dispute (M. Siddiq v. Mahant Suresh Das). The Court allowed applications for substitution of legal representatives, permitted service of summons on counsel, and directed deletion of respondents as prayed. To ensure fairness, the Court fixed strict timeframes: 12 weeks for parties to translate all exhibits, and 10 weeks for the State to translate oral evidence, with translations to be in bound volumes for distribution to counsel. No further adjournments would be granted for these purposes. The appeals were listed for substantive hearing on 5 December 2017.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Service of Summons Court Management Substitution of Parties

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login