Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-03-14 partly_allowed

M. Siddiq (D) Thr. Lrs vs Mahant Suresh Das and Ors. etc

Bench: 3 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

This interlocutory order in the consolidated Ayodhya land dispute appeals (Civil Appeals 10866-10867/2010 and related cases) rejected numerous applications for intervention and impleadment by third parties. The Court permitted only parties to the appeals to file further applications. Importantly, the judgment addressed a submission that the Constitution Bench's decision in Dr. M. Ismail Faruqui (1994) 6 SCC 360 requires reconsideration. The three-Judge Bench decided to hear arguments on whether the matter warrants referral to a larger Bench for that review. All procedural interlocutory applications filed by the parties themselves were allowed. The matter was adjourned for further hearings.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Procedural Law Interlocutory Applications Land Disputes Religious Properties

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login