Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-04-24 allowed

MAGHAVENDRA PRATAP SINGH @ PANKAJ SINGH vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Bench: 2 — B.R. Gavai, Sanjay Karol

In Brief

A businessman, Goverdhan Aggarwal, was shot and killed in September 2009 following extortion threats. The appellant, Pankaj Singh, was the sole person convicted by the trial court and High Court for murder (Section 302 IPC), concealment of evidence (Section 201 IPC), and illegal firearm possession (Arms Act). The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and acquitted him. The Court held that in circumstantial evidence cases, guilt must be established with certainty, not mere probability. The investigating officer's conduct showed numerous procedural lapses, independent witnesses did not support prosecution, and all co-accused were acquitted. The High Court's standard of "all human probability" was erroneous; the correct test requires all evidence to conclusively point to guilt as the only possibility.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Investigation Circumstantial Evidence Criminal Conspiracy Evidence Act Arms Act Murder Police Investigations

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login