Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 11 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-02-08 allowed

Mahanth Satyanand @ Ramjee Singh vs Shyam Lal Chauhan and Others

Bench: 2 — N.V. Ramana

In Brief

The Supreme Court set aside a High Court order that had allowed both rival claimants to participate in a pending appeal, each claiming to be the sole legal representative of a deceased appellant. The Court held that when a question arises about who is the legal representative of a deceased party, the appellate court must first determine that question conclusively under Order 22 Rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Code, based on the trial court's report and any objections, before proceeding with the substantive issues. The High Court cannot simply allow all rival claimants to argue simultaneously without deciding the representative question. The appeals were allowed and the matter was remitted to the High Court for proper determination.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Succession Legal Representation Appellate Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login