Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-07-05 partly_allowed

Mahipal Singh Rana, Advocate vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Bench: 3 — Anil R. Dave

In Brief

An advocate was convicted by the High Court of criminal contempt for intimidating and threatening a Civil Judge on two occasions, and sentenced to two months imprisonment plus a fine. On appeal, the Supreme Court upheld the conviction but set aside the imprisonment sentence due to the appellant's advanced age. The Court upheld the fine and the direction barring him from appearing in courts in District Etah until he purges contempt. It also imposed automatic suspension of enrollment under the Advocates Act for two years and an additional five-year suspension of his license as a disciplinary measure. The judgment emphasizes that courts have inherent power to regulate advocates' court appearance and maintain judicial dignity, distinct from Bar Councils' disciplinary powers.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Contempt of Courts Legal Profession Professional Discipline Bar Council Advocates Act Judicial Dignity Criminal Contempt Regulatory Mechanism Court Procedure Rule of Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login