Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-12 partly_allowed

Mala Singh & Ors vs State of Haryana

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

Three accused were convicted of murder under Section 302/34 IPC by the High Court, while eight co-accused were acquitted. The Supreme Court held that where eight co-accused are acquitted on a charge framed under Section 149 IPC (unlawful assembly), the charge under Section 149 collapses for remaining accused numbering fewer than five. Although the appellate court has jurisdiction to alter charges, the absence of evidence of common intention makes conviction under Section 302/34 IPC legally unsustainable. Since the appellants' individual acts caused only simple injuries and fatal injuries were inflicted by acquitted or deceased co-accused, the Court converted their conviction to Section 324 IPC, reducing sentence to time already served (seven years) plus a fine of Rs. 10,000/- each.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Murder Unlawful Assembly Common Intention Charge Alteration Evidence

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login