In Brief
The Supreme Court upheld the acquisition of land under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for 'planned development of Delhi.' The appellant, a charitable medical institute holding a lease and agreement to sell, challenged the acquisition as vague and lacking public purpose. The Court held that where a zonal development plan (bound by the Delhi Development Act, 1957) designates land for institutional purposes, the notification need not specify the exact end use. Planned development in accordance with a binding zonal plan is a valid public purpose. The Court distinguished the case from earlier precedent requiring detailed specification and upheld the acquisition as lawful.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.