Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-12-04 allowed

Mohd. Akhtar @ Kari & Ors vs State of Bihar & Anr

Bench: 2 — L. Nageswara Rao

In Brief

The Supreme Court reversed the High Court's conviction and restored the trial court's acquittal in a murder case. The appellants were accused of killing one person as part of a mob. The trial court had acquitted them, citing unreliable eyewitness identification, delay in the FIR, improper investigation (including failure to examine key witnesses and recover physical evidence), and previous enmity between parties. The High Court reversed the acquittal, treating the trial court's concerns as minor inconsistencies. The Supreme Court held that an appellate court cannot reverse an acquittal merely because another view is possible. Where two reasonable interpretations of evidence exist, the court must favour the accused. The appellate court failed to give proper weight to the trial court's findings and ignored principles protecting acquittals. The Court restored the acquittal and discharged bail bonds.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Appeal Against Acquittal Evidence Witness Credibility Murder

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login