Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-07-05 disposed

Mohd. Ibrahim vs State of Karnataka and Others

Bench: 2 — 2

In Brief

Two criminal appeals challenged the conviction of accused persons under Section 326 IPC (causing grievous hurt) by the High Court of Karnataka, which had upheld the trial court's judgment. The Supreme Court found the convictions justified on evidence. However, both the accused and complainant sought permission to compound the offence, asserting that they were related parties who had lived peacefully together for nine years following the incident. The Court exercised its discretionary power under Article 142 of the Constitution to permit compounding, finding that the parties had freely agreed to settle and that genuine reconciliation had occurred. The convictions and sentences were modified and merged in the Court's order, releasing the accused from serving any further sentence. The appeals were disposed of.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Article 142 Compounding of Offences Discretionary Jurisdiction Criminal Appeals

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login