Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-07-05 partly_allowed

Mrinalini Padhi vs Union of India

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

In this writ petition concerning Sri Jagannath Temple, Puri, the Supreme Court examined complaints about exploitative practices, poor hygiene, and deficient management. The Court accepted the District Judge's comprehensive report suggesting reforms including regulation of hereditary positions, cessation of illegal money collection, improved sanitation, queue systems, and fund audits. The Court held that shrine management issues fall within the Concurrent List under the Constitution and directed District Judges across India to examine similar grievances and report to High Courts. The Court emphasized that religious shrines should permit visitors irrespective of faith, subject to reasonable regulations, and directed both State and Central Governments to form committees to improve shrine management nationwide. The matter was adjourned for further consideration.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Temple Management Religious Institutions Seventh Schedule Public Interest Litigation Administrative Law Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login