Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-06-08 partly_allowed

Mrinalini Padhi vs Union of India & Ors

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The Supreme Court addressed a public interest petition concerning difficulties faced by visitors to Shri Jagannath Temple at Puri, including harassment by temple staff, commercialization of rituals, management deficiencies, and poor hygiene. The Court held that proper management of major pilgrimage centres is a matter of public interest and cultural heritage importance. It issued interim directions appointing the District Judge to investigate visitor difficulties and exploitative practices, directed enhanced CCTV monitoring to prevent misappropriation of offerings, and constituted committees to study management practices at other major shrines nationwide to identify reforms benefiting all visitors.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Religious Freedom Temple Management Public Interest Constitutional Rights Cultural Heritage Administrative Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login