Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-06-08 disposed

Mrinalini Padhi vs Union of India & Ors

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The Supreme Court examined a public interest petition regarding difficulties faced by visitors to Shri Jagannath Temple in Puri, including harassment by temple staff (Sevaks), commercialization of rituals, and poor hygiene. The Court held that proper management of major pilgrimage centres is a matter of public interest given their religious, historical and architectural significance. The Court relied on prior precedent upholding provisions requiring offerings to be collected in designated boxes rather than directly by staff. The Court issued interim directions requiring investigation into visitor difficulties, review of CCTV systems, prevention of direct collection of offerings by Sevaks, and study of management practices at other major shrines nationwide. The matter was listed for further consideration.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Religion and Public Order Constitutional Law Writ Petitions Temple Management Public Interest Litigation Cultural Heritage Fundamental Rights

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login