Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-09-23 allowed

National Highways Authority of India & Others vs Madhukar Kumar & Others

Bench: 2 — K.M. Joseph

In Brief

The National Highways Authority of India appealed a High Court order requiring relocation of a toll plaza at 194 km of NH30 in the Patna-Bakhtiyarpur section. Local residents had challenged its location as violating Rule 8 of the 2008 Toll Rules. The Supreme Court held that the second proviso to Rule 8 permits toll plaza location within municipal limits if the highway section is constructed there primarily for local residents' use. The Court found that the 14 km section within Patna's limits was primarily constructed to relieve congestion for residents. Since the location was supported by detailed project report findings and commercial considerations were legitimate, the Court allowed the appeal, set aside the relocation order, and directed authorities to ensure compliance with rules on service road closures and to extend toll concessions to local residents as mandated by Rule 9."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Statutory Interpretation Toll Plaza Regulation Public Works Rule of Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login