Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-12-08 partly_allowed

Project Director, Project Implementation Unit vs P.V. Krishnamoorthy & Ors

Bench: 3 — A.M. Khanwilkar

In Brief

The Supreme Court examined the validity of notifications under the National Highways Act, 1956, for acquiring land to construct a new expressway (Chennai-Krishnagiri-Salem National Corridor) as part of the Bharatmala project. The High Court had quashed the notifications, holding that prior environmental clearance was mandatory and the decision to change the original project (Chennai-Madurai Economic Corridor) lacked proper authority. The Supreme Court held: (1) Parliament has exclusive power to declare non-existent roads or green-field lands as national highways; (2) prior environmental clearance is not required before Section 3A notifications, only before commencement of construction; (3) the decision to modify the project was within ministerial discretion under approved guidelines; (4) time spent obtaining environmental clearances shall be excluded from the one-year deadline under Section 3D(3). The Court partly allowed the appeals of the Union and NHAI, quashing the High Court's order while upholding the direction to restore land entries.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Administrative Law Land Acquisition Environmental Law Infrastructure Development Judicial Review Public Interest Litigation National Highways

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login