Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-09-23 allowed

NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA & OTHERS vs MADHUKAR KUMAR & OTHERS

Bench: 2 — K.M. Joseph, S. Ravindra Bhat

In Brief

The Supreme Court upheld the establishment of a toll plaza at the 194 km mark of NH-30 in Bihar, overturning the High Court's order to relocate it. The issue was whether the toll plaza's location within municipal limits violated Rule 8 of the National Highways Fee Rules, 2008. The Court found that while Rule 8 generally prohibits toll plazas within 10 km of municipal areas, the second proviso permits them within municipal limits if the highway section was constructed primarily for local residents' benefit. The Court held that no written reasons were required to invoke this proviso, distinguishing it from the first proviso. Finding that the highway construction substantially benefited local residents and that revenue considerations were legitimate, the Court allowed the appeal and set aside the relocation order, though requiring compliance with service road rules and extension of applicable fee concessions."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Constitutional Law Infrastructure & Highways Natural Justice Public Interest Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login