Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-07-25 disposed

Neeraj Kumar Rai and ors vs State of U.P. & Others

Bench: 2 — Adarsh Kumar Goel

In Brief

The Supreme Court considered whether teacher candidates with B.Ed. qualifications and 50%+ marks in post-graduation could be excluded solely because their graduation marks fell short of 50% under a 2011 notification. The Court held that such exclusion was arbitrary and violated Article 14, as the 50% graduation requirement was earlier optional for those with higher post-graduation marks. Accepting the NCTE's own position and endorsing similar judgments from Rajasthan and Uttarakhand High Courts, the Court granted relief to the appellants and directed the NCTE to issue a clarification within one month and authorities to reconsider claims of similarly placed candidates.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Education Law Constitutional Law Right to Equality Administrative Law Teacher Recruitment Article 14

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login