Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-07-25 disposed

Neeraj Kumar Rai and ors vs State of U.P. & Others

Bench: 2 — Adarsh Kumar Goel

In Brief

This case concerns whether B.Ed.-qualified teacher candidates with 50% marks in post-graduation could be excluded from recruitment solely because their graduation marks fell below 50%—a requirement newly imposed in a 2011 NCTE notification, when this was previously optional. The Supreme Court held that candidates who obtained qualifications when the graduation percentage requirement did not exist cannot be retrospectively subjected to it, as this violates Article 14. Following similar relief granted by Rajasthan and Uttarakhand High Courts and the NCTE's acceptance of those judgments, the Court directed equivalent relief for the appellants and directed NCTE to issue a clarificatory supplementary notification.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Education Law Employment and Service Law Right to Equality Administrative Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login