Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-20 partly_allowed

Nehnu Ram @ Narendra vs State of Rajasthan & Anr

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The appellant was convicted of rape and abduction of a 15-year-old girl under Sections 363, 366, and 376 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to seven years imprisonment. The appellant argued that the girl went with him voluntarily and that they are now both married to others with children. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, rejecting the argument that a minor can give valid consent to sexual intercourse. However, the Court invoked the proviso to Section 376(1) to reduce the sentence to the period already undergone (approximately 1 year 7 months), citing adequate and special reasons: the incident occurred 30 years ago, both parties are now settled in life, the appellant has no criminal antecedents, and the victim did not appear to oppose the reduction.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Sexual Offences Sentencing Rape Abduction Minor Protection

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login