Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-01-31 allowed

PARIMAL KUMAR & ORS vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS

Bench: 2 — J.K. Maheshwari, Rajesh Bindal

In Brief

JTET-qualified candidates challenged the High Court's order allowing CTET and STET-qualified candidates to participate in an ongoing teacher recruitment process in Jharkhand, where JTET was the stipulated minimum qualification under the 2022 Recruitment Rules. The Supreme Court held that once a recruitment process commences with an advertisement, the eligibility criteria cannot be altered midway without explicit authority in the rules or advertisement. The High Court's direction permitting different qualifications, based on the Advocate General's concession contrary to the State's earlier stand, was arbitrary and violated Article 16. Only JTET holders who possessed the requisite qualification on the advertisement date are eligible. The Court reaffirmed the principle that changing eligibility criteria mid-process deprives candidates of equal opportunity.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Right to Education Teacher Recruitment Eligibility Criteria Administrative Law Public Employment Article 14 and 16 of Constitution of India RTE Act 2009

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login