Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-09-27 disposed

Pattipati Venkateswarly Naidu vs Special Deputy Collector (L.A.)

Bench: 2 — Kurian

In Brief

These consolidated appeals concern enhancement of compensation for pomegranate trees acquired for the Telugu Ganga/Somashila Project between 1990–1994. The High Court had refused to hear the enhancement claims due to unexplained delay. The Supreme Court held that where claimants are denied statutory benefits for the delay period, a lenient approach to delay condonation is warranted in enhancement cases. The Court fixed compensation at Rs. 3,000 per tree (not Rs. 2,000), aligning with an earlier judgment for the same project, and remitted one case to the High Court for merit review. Statutory benefits were denied only for the delay period."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Compensation Delay Condonation Agricultural Property Constitutional Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login