Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-09-27 disposed

Pattipati Venkateswarly Naidu vs Special Deputy Collector (L.A.)

Bench: 2 — Kurian

In Brief

In a batch of civil appeals concerning land acquired for the Telugu Ganga/Somashila Project, the appellants sought enhancement of compensation for pomegranate trees from Rs. 2,000 to Rs. 3,000 per tree. The High Court had dismissed the claims due to unexplained delay. The Supreme Court held that where claimants are denied statutory benefits during the delay period, the Court should take a lenient view in condoning the delay. Following the rate established in an earlier decision for the same project, the Court fixed compensation at Rs. 3,000 per tree, but denied statutory benefits for the entire period of delay."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Compensation Delay and Condonation Statutory Benefits Agricultural Property

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login