Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Tuesday, 03 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-01-18 allowed

Pishora Singh vs Bank of Punjab and Ors

Bench: 2 — 2

In Brief

A customer obtained three Fixed Deposit Receipts (FDRs) from Bank of Punjab: two for Rs 1 lakh each (24 Feb 1996) and one for Rs 2 lakh (8 Mar 1996). The bank later refused to encash the Rs 2 lakh FDR, claiming it was issued by mistake without consideration. The District Consumer Forum held the customer entitled to encashment; the State Commission reversed this; and the National Commission dismissed the customer's revision. The Supreme Court held that a bank cannot refuse to honour an FDR it has issued merely because of its own internal error. The customer, holding the valid FDR receipt, is entitled to encashment. The bank's remedy lies against its employees, not the innocent customer. The Court allowed the appeal and restored the District Forum's order."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Consumer Protection Banking Law Fixed Deposits Defective FDR Estoppel

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login