Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-20 partly_allowed

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Shimla vs Aarham Softronics

Bench: 3 — A.K. Sikri

In Brief

An assessee who sets up a new manufacturing unit in Himachal Pradesh under Section 80-IC and claims 100% tax deduction for five years may undertake substantial expansion of that unit thereafter. The Supreme Court held that substantial expansion (involving 50% or more investment in plant and machinery) triggers a new 'initial assessment year' under Section 80-IC(8)(v), entitling the assessee to 100% deduction again for the remaining assessment years, subject to a maximum of 10 assessment years total from the first initial assessment year. The High Court's decision was affirmed; the Revenue's appeals were dismissed and assessees' appeals were allowed, reversing an earlier Supreme Court judgment that had wrongly applied a different definition of 'initial assessment year'.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Taxation Income Tax Tax Deduction Industrial Undertakings Special Category States Substantial Expansion

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login