Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-20 allowed

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX SHIMLA vs M/S AARHAM SOFTRONICS

Bench: 3 — A.K. Sikri, S. Abdul Nazeer, M.R. Shah

In Brief

The Supreme Court examined whether a manufacturing unit in Himachal Pradesh that sets up under Section 80-IC of the Income Tax Act and claims 100% tax exemption for five years can claim the same exemption rate after carrying out substantial expansion. The Court held that the statutory definition of "initial assessment year" in Section 80-IC permits multiple such years within the 10-year deduction ceiling. When an undertaking completes substantial expansion (a 50% increase in plant and machinery), that year becomes a fresh "initial assessment year," entitling it to 100% deduction for five more years. The Court overruled its earlier judgment in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Classic Binding Industries, which had incorrectly applied the definition from Section 80-IB. The Court affirmed the High Court's judgment and dismissed the Revenue's appeals.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Tax Exemption Industrial Deduction Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login