In Brief
The Supreme Court addressed a housing allotment dispute where HUDA officials improperly restored plot allotment and executed conveyances to an appellant while litigation was pending in consumer commissions. Though the State and National Consumer Commissions had reversed the District Forum's restoration order, the appellant had constructed a house on the plot. The Court found HUDA officials complicit in the fraudulent allotment but allowed the appellant to retain the plot on condition of depositing the prevailing market rate within six months, directing disciplinary action against culpable officials.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.