In Brief
This criminal appeal concerns charges of trespass, theft of wheat crops, unlawful assembly, and criminal intimidation. The trial court acquitted the accused after finding no cogent evidence that the complainant possessed the disputed land, rendering the entire case of unlawful crop cutting doubtful. The High Court reversed the acquittal on re-appreciation of evidence. The Supreme Court held that the High Court was not justified in merely re-appreciating evidence without identifying perversity in the trial judge's approach. The Court emphasized that in appeals against acquittal, the appellate court must respect the trial court's careful appreciation of evidence. The acquittal was restored.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.