Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-04-29 allowed

PUNIT BERIWALA vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS

Bench: 2 — Dipankar Datta, Manmohan

In Brief

The Supreme Court revived an FIR quashed by the Delhi High Court against Vikramjit Singh and Maheep Singh for alleged forgery, fraud and conspiracy in a property transaction. The respondents had allowed an incompetent person to misrepresent himself as Karta of a Hindu Undivided Family while signing an Agreement to Sell, causing the complainant to lose Rs. 1.64 crore. The Court held that mere institution of civil proceedings does not bar criminal investigation, delay in filing the FIR was not fatal for offences carrying over three years' imprisonment, and the allegations disclose cognizable offences requiring investigation.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Fraud and Forgery Conspiracy Section 482 Jurisdiction Property Disputes HUF Law Cheating

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login